PLEA FOR THE CORPS TO INCLUDE DESTRUCTION OF FRESH WATER AND ECONOMICS IN REEVALUATING DROUGHT PLAN

Following is a copy of a recent comment on balancing the basin which sums up our views nicely. 

COPY OF COMMENT TO CORPS:

The parameters for evaluating the various drought plans do not include retention of as much fresh water as possible without doing damage to the environment and similar concerns for the economics of the area. Everyone will attest to the idea that wanton destruction of fresh water during a drought is unforgiveable. And the economics of the area sucks because of the horrible reputation on lake level control over the past 15 years.  Yet neither were considered in your previous determination of which plan was best. As engineers it is the job of the corps to come up with the best technical answers possible in managing our lakes.  It is not to blindly follow some rules written in 1985 by congressmen who do not have the necessary information to come up with the best plan.

Please add these two considerations when reevaluating the test data to come up with the optimum drought protection plan.

HELP US GET OUR CONGRESSMEN TO UNDERSTAND OUR NEEDS ON LAKE LEVEL CONTROL

Our congressmen can help get the Corps to act more responsibly on lake level control but they do not have a good understanding of what lever to pull to make this happen.  We do.  If you will help, maybe we can educate our congressmen and get the help needed.  Emails or phone calls or letters to your congressmen can make this happen if enough of us get behind the effort.

Two major things the Corps ignores are keeping the Corps from making the final changes needed to minimize drastic lake level drops.  They are the gross waste of fresh water from higher than necessary releases and the economic impact on businesses connected with providing recreation around the lakes such as the marinas and real estate values for homes around the lakes.

Looking at the waste of fresh water, the Corps is releasing 4200cfs from Thurmond right now instead of holding back to the minimum demonstrated to have no environmental impact which is 3600cfs.  Every drop of fresh water released is doomed to become salt water as it enters the harbor at Savannah. This 600cfs difference represents the unnecessary destruction of 400million gallons of fresh water each day.

Looking at the impact on businesses and real estate we are talking hundreds of millions of dollars any time the lakes drop more than 6ft. The full impact is much more than is obvious looking at monthly or even yearly economic data.  The full impact is in destruction of the reputation of the whole region over a period of years that will take on the order of 10 years with good lake levels to correct.

The Corps evaluation of the recent study to determine an optimum drought control plan fails to include destruction of fresh water and economic impact.  If the Corps were instructed to consider these by our congressmen the resulting optimum drought plan would be the one we have espoused for years; drop to minimum safe release rates any time lake levels cannot be held to full pool. Please help us educate our congressmen about this.  Save Our Lakes Now has informed our congressmen of this but we are only one voice against the voice of a very persuasive Corps.  Hundreds or thousands of voices are needed to convince our congressmen that something needs to happen now.

One other thing our congressmen need to understand is the plan we are recommending will not do any damage to the harbor at Savannah.  Recent information indicates some uninformed organizations such as the state chamber of commerce fear any change might do harm to the harbor and thereby have a negative impact on a major source of income for the state. We would be glad to meet with anyone having this concern to prove to them that such a concern is unwarranted.

COMMENT ON 1/18 TO BALANCING THE BASIN HITS HOME

A COMMENT TO TODAYS BALANCING THE BASIN HITS HOME ON HOW THE CORPS IS HARMING THE ECONOMICS OF THE COMMUNITIES ALONG THE SAVANNAH RIVER BASIN.  THE COMMENT FOLLOWS:

The corps dedication to the harbor environment is admirable.  Their lack of concern for the economics of the impoverished communities along the lakes is not.  The horrible reputation of lake level control has stymied economic growth (real estate values, growth associated with highly attractive recreation areas and accompanying growth that occurs from both) for all communities adjacent to the lakes. Basically the Corps is destroying economics in a fashion similar to unrealistic regulations from the EPA. Hopefully we can get the attention of the Trump administration so they can help here the way they did with coal interests in West Virginia.

SOLN IS SEEKING A WAY TO GET AUDIENCE WITH CONGRESS OR THE PRESIDENT SINCE TRUMP IS FULLY BEHIND ELIMINATING UNNECCESSARY REGULATIONS.  IF YOU HAVE PERSONAL ACCESS TO ANY OF OUR CONGRESSMEN PLEASE GET IN TOUCH WITH JERRY CLONTZ VIA EMAIL bgclontz@gmail.com.  WE ARE LOOKING TO MEET WITH DAVID PERDUE AND ARE AWAITING RESPONSE FROM JODI HICE AND JEFF DUNCAN.  IN EACH CASE YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THEIR STAFF WHO OFTEN TIMES ARE NOT IN SYMPATHY WITH OUR NEEDS.  WHAT IS NEEDED IS DIRECT CONTACT FROM SOMEONE THEY TRUST.

COMMENT TO RECENT BALANCING THE BASIN

One of our members recently submitted the following comment to the Corps Balancing the Basin release where they tried to defend their management of our lakes during droughts.  Thought this was a pretty good summary of our situation.

"The problem is not the drought.  The problem is the Corps' refusal to deviate from a failed drought control plan.  We've pleaded for 3600 cfs as a standard when the lakes cannot be held at full pool (3100 during winter months) and the corps has thumbed their nose at us making the fallacious claim that SEPA makes them hold to higher releases for power demands.  Top management at SEPA has repeatedly told us (and i sat in on a meeting when they told the same thing to the colonel then commander for our lakes) that they can make up any power deficiencies from elsewhere in their hydropower system.  This behavior by the Corps is devastating to the economics of the struggling rural communities around the lakes and frankly is unforegiveable.  We are seeking congressional help to this in view of Trump's desire to eliminate ridiculous regulations that destroy economics."

LETTER TO PRESIDENT BY MEMBER OF SOLN

Not sure whether this will ever see the light of day in view of all that the president has on his plate, but one of our members recently sent this email to the president concerning the way the Corps is managing our lakes.

The Corps of Engineers for the Savannah River Basin is holding back progress for the miles and miles of lake side properties and communities along the Savannah River which runs between Georgia and South Carolina from the blue ridge Mountains to the Atlantic Ocean.  We at Save Our Lakes Now are in a position to document this statement and answer any questions concerning this accusation.  I personally am a Chemical Engineer from UVA and fully qualified to discuss why the Corps is failing to manage our lakes in a fashion consistent with Making America Great Again. As with Hillary and coal mining they are determined to hold back growth of this area for irrational reasons similar to the abuse of power practiced by the EPA.
I am a business owner and own a number of properties along Clarks Hill Lake (also known as Lake Thurmond) and have been destroyed from a business perspective by the overreach and irrational rules put in place by the Corps.  Literally this area should be booming in a fashion similar to the Grand Strand of South Carolina but instead has been going backwards financially for over 25 years due to the ridiculous manner in which the Corps is managing the lakes.  We have offered fair and balanced answers to the question of how to manage the lakes in a fashion that gives maximum benefit to both the areas around the lakes and the stakeholders along the river below the lakes.  But the Corps refuses to listen.  Furthermore our congressmen Jeff Duncan and Jodi Hice have proven totally ineffective in helping with this matter.  This is due to too few voters along the lakes and an unwillingness to get involved and fight the Corps. 
One quick scenario on what is happening: Our lakes are constantly down 10 feet and more which destroys real estate and business interests while the other lakes in this area which are managed by power companies are seldom down more than a foot or two.  In addition to the destruction of real estate and business interests the Corps' insistence on releasing more water than is provided by rain is wasting billions of gallons of fresh water on a daily basis in that every drop of water released from the lakes goes directly to the ocean where it becomes totally unusable.

LET'S SCORE THE CORPS

LAKE THURMOND WAS BUILT IN 1954 AND THE OTHER TWO LAKES FOLLOWED OVER THE NEXT 30 YEARS.  THE US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS WAS ASSIGNED TO MANAGE THESE LAKES BY CONGRESS.  THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES INCLUDE:
                                                    FULL LAKE                         DROUGHT          - 10 FT 
                                                  
       RESPONSIBILITY                     

1. HYDRO POWER                      A                                           C                          D
2. FLOOD CONTROL                  A                                           A                          A
3. NAVIGATION                         NA                                        NA                       NA
4. WATER QUALITY                  A                                            A                          F
5. WATER SUPPLY                     A                                            A                          F
6. FISH & WILDLIFE                   A                                            A                         F
7. RECREATION                          A                                            C                          F

ADDING ONE MORE THAT SHOULD BE THERE:

      8. FRESH WATER SUPPLY        A                                             F                         0

I'VE TAKEN THE LIBERTY TO GIVE MY IDEA OF HOW WELL THE CORPS IS DOING ON EACH OF THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES.  

AS LONG AS THE LAKES ARE FULL THE CORPS SCORES GOOD GRADES.  ONCE THE LAKES DROP DUE TO DROUGHT EVERYTHING EXCEPT RECREATION AND FRESH WATER SUPPLY CONTINUES TO BE SATISFACTORY.  RECREATION DOES NOT GET A FAILING GRADE UNTIL THE LAKES DROP MORE THAN 10FT. FRESH WATER SUPPLY DROPS TO AN F ANYTIME THE LAKES ARE RELEASING MORE WATER THAN IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY TO TAKE CARE OF DOWNSTREAM NEEDS (EG 3600CFS IS A GOOD START BUT WASTE RELEASES TO THE RIVER NEED TO BE MINIMIZED AS MUCH AS PRACTICAL IN ORDER TO DROP MINIMUM FLOWS EVEN FURTHER).

CONTRARY TO WHAT MOST WOULD THINK THEY SHOULD GET HORRIBLE GRADES ON EVERYTHING EXCEPT FLOOD CONTROL BECAUSE OF THE HIGH RISK SITUATION THIS REPRESENTS.  ALTHOUGH 3600 CFS MEETS MOST NEEDS DOWNSTREAM CONTINUED DROPS BEYOND 10' DOWN PUTS EVERYTHING EXCEPT FLOOD CONTROL AT UNACCEPTABLE LEVELS. HYDRO POWER BECAUSE SEPA DEPENDS ON US PRIMARILY FOR PEAKING POWER AND NEARLY DESTROYED LAKES MAKE A POOR SOURCE OF PEAKING POWER.  WATER QUALITY AND WATER SUPPLY ETC. HAVE NOW MOVED TO A VERY DANGEROUS STATUS WHEREBY THE CORPS MAY NEED TO CHOSE BETWEEN TOTALLY DESTROYING THE LAKES ONE AT A TIME OR NOT BE ABLE TO SUPPLY DOWNSTREAM NEEDS.

EVERYBODY BUT THE CORPS RECOGNIZES THAT THEY GET AN F ON RECREATION ANYTIME THEY ARE RELEASING MORE THAN THE MINIMUM NEEDED DOWNSTREAM WITH THE LAKES BELOW FULL POOL.  THE CORPS USES THE LAME EXCUSE THAT RECREATION IS ONLY PARK ATTENDANCE AND RAMP CLOSURES.  BUT AS THE REST OF THE WORLD RECOGNIZES RECREATION HAS TO DO WITH INFRASTRUCTURE SUCH AS REAL ESTATE, BUSINESS HEALTH OF LAKE SIDE BUSINESSES,  AND THE OVER ALL ATTRACTION OF THIS AREA AS A PLACE FOR RECREATION.  WITH THE BEAUTY OF OUR LAKES THE WHOLE AREA SHOULD BE GROWING BUT THE HORRIBLE REPUTATION WE HAVE SINCE THE DROUGHT OF 2002 DISCOURAGES GROWTH AND HAS BANKRUPTED MANY BUSINESS TIED TO RECREATION THAT SHOULD BE FLOURISHING.

REGARDING FRESH WATER, JUST LOOK AT HOW DNR PANICS ANYTIME AN AQUIFER STARTS DROPPING IN LEVEL.  IT IS BEYOND ME HOW THESE SAME PEOPLE SAY NOTHING WHEN LAKE LEVELS ARE WASTED ON FOOLISH RELEASE RATES.

ON A SIDE NOTE LET ME MENTION FLOOD CONTROL.  THE CORPS HAS NOW DECIDED THE EMPTIER THE LAKES ARE THE BETTER IN CASE WE SHOULD GET HEAVY RAINS.  WHEN THE LAKES CONSISTED ONLY OF LAKE THURMOND A  4'F BUFFER WAS PUT INTO THE GUIDE CURVE FOR THE LAKES WHEREBY THE LAKES ARE DROPPED 4' IN THE FALL AND WINTER IN PREPARATION FOR HIGH WATER RUN OFF.  NOW WITH 3 LAKES TO COLLECT THE SAME RAIN WATER RUN OFF FOR THE BASIN, A 2' BUFFER SHOULD ACCOMPLISH THE SAME DEGREE OF PROTECTION.  BUT IN SPITE OF PLEAS FROM SAVE OUR LAKES NOW THE CORPS REFUSES TO DROP BACK TO A 2' DRAWDOWN.  THEY GIVE THE REASON THAT THERE MAY BE MORE RUN OFF NOW THAN IN THE PAST.  HOW CAN THAT BE TRUE WHEN THE BASIN SIZE HAS NOT CHANGED AND IF ANYTHING, WE ARE NOW MORE PRONE TO DROUGHTS.  GO FIGURE!

ESSENCE OF OUR PROBLEM

FOLLOWING IS AN EXCERPT FROM A RECENT EMAIL BETWEEN SOME MEMBERS OF SAVE OUR LAKES NOW.  WE AGREE!

The argument has become one that has no bearing on logic.  The Colonel is simply thumbing his nose at us saying he will do what he damn well pleases and no one is going to stop him.  That works for running an army but it stinks to heaven when you are impacting civilian concerns.  it is going to take someone willing to put the Corps in their place to get this corrected.  Trump is the kind of person who could and would do it but he is too far removed at present to get involved.  What we need is a congressman or senator who will get Trump's backing and put an end to this mess. SOLN can help by keeping the light on the problem but we have been unable to find a congressman to fight this fight.  Jeff Duncan is far too weak on this subject.  Maybe Jody Hice will take this on.  If not we need to elect someone who will in 2018.